DV Journal

For an alternate viewpoint, see “Counterpoint: Defending TikTok Defends the First Amendment”

President-elect Trump is correct in stalling the decision to ban TikTok from appearing before the Supreme Court. This delay reinforces the position of diplomacy or peace through strategy. Previously scheduled to appear before the Supreme Court on January 19, the day before the presidential inauguration, Trump is trying to push a pause.

The American public can perceive this as a strategic maneuver — not a change of position on the national ban of TikTok. A short delay ensures the Trump administration, without overlapping with the Biden administration, presents the case for such a monumental decision that will establish precedence between America and China for decades.

TikTok is a weapon of social destruction created by ByteDance, a Beijing-based company. The Chinese Communist Party owns the data of millions of users globally. This archived data is a digital footprint that can be exploited and used to create deepfakes, a realistic mirror image of its users. Deepfakes in the hands of America’s adversaries create national security concerns.

TikTok’s user data archives the lives of minors, private citizens and world leaders. Trump acknowledged that his position on TikTok had changed during his 2024 presidential campaign. The social media application helped Trump connect with voters. The new president and his administration must remember the campaign season is over, and now is the time to create and pass innovative, effective legislation. In addition, voters who were reached by Trump’s campaign on the TikTok application are American citizens whose safety is at risk in the hands of the CCP.

House Speaker Mike Johnson has been adamant about his support of a nationwide ban on TikTok and the threat the application poses to America’s national security. There has been an increasing bipartisan consensus for a national ban on TikTok. Now re-elected as speaker of the House, Johnson must hold fast to his position.

States should follow Montana’s example. It will be the first state to ban TikTok if Congress fails to pass legislation or Trump significantly delays the TikTok ban from appearing before the Supreme Court.

Trump is faced with establishing diplomacy with the CCP not only to ban TikTok but also concerning nuclear security and weapons of mass destruction. The two are related.

TikTok, a weapon of social destruction, has ramifications for weapons of mass destruction. America’s nuclear command and control uses presidential communication along a chain of command, including uniformed leaders, select positions within the president’s Cabinet, and national security advisers within the executive branch. Incoming and outgoing messages must be confirmed as reliable and authentic. The CCP could use TikTok’s data to create deepfake messages that appear genuine but confuse reliability to or in the representation of America’s leaders.

The ban on TikTok can be part of arms control and other high-level negotiations between the West and the East. In 2026, New START, a nuclear arms reduction treaty between the United States and Russia, is set to expire, and there will be no formal arms control agreement between the two powers — and now China. All three are near peers in terms of nuclear weapons and deployment capabilities.

A potential TikTok ban faces a trifecta of judgment across America’s executive, legislative and judicial branches. The checks and balances within and between each branch are constitutionally designed to ensure the nation’s and its citizens’ well-being. The data of America, in the hands of its adversaries, presents the possibility of catastrophic consequences.

The platform of peace through strategy allows Trump and the 119th Congress to cooperatively build diplomatic and intentional legislative, economic and national security policies that reflect a grand plan. The ends, ways and means should advance U.S. and partner interests globally and never at the expense of innocent Americans who trust social media applications. Innovation and the free market can allow for a new social media application that does not violate the user’s trust and risks harming the nation.

Banning TikTok is a decisive step in the right direction. Soon after Trump’s inauguration and essential administration positions are Senate confirmed, the TikTok ban should appear before the Supreme Court. If the CCP retaliates against the TikTok ban, Trump can effectively lead an appropriate national response, whether militarily, peace through strength, or diplomatically, peace through strategy.

Secretary of the Commonwealth Al Schmidt announced Wednesday the margin between U.S. Sen. Bob Casey and Dave McCormick is so narrow — within 0.5 percent — that a mandatory recount has been triggered under state law.

“This is the eighth time the automatic recount provision has been triggered since the passage of Act 97 of 2004,” Schmidt’s office reported, and the second to involve McCormick. He narrowly lost the GOP U.S. Senate primary to Mehmet Oz two years ago.

Meanwhile, the Casey campaign is accusing McCormick of trying to use a Pennsylvania court ruling to disenfranchise voters. But that ruling didn’t apply to the last Tuesday’s general election.

At issue is a 3-2 ruling made Oct. 30 by the Commonwealth Court that said 69 undated and incorrectly dated absentee and mail-in ballots in a Philadelphia special election should have been counted.

The Philadelphia County Board of Elections initially ruled the ballots were ineligible. When a trial court overruled the Elections Board, state and national Republicans appealed.

One day later, the state Supreme Court said the ruling was “stayed and shall not be applied” to this year’s General Election.

A furious Justice Kevin M. Dougherty heaped scorn on the lower court in a concurring opinion. He accused Commonwealth Court judges of changing the electoral game “on the very eve of the election.” Dougherty noted mail ballots had been shipped and returned and voters, boards of elections, and election workers were already advised on “the handling of undated and misdated ballots.”

Justice Christine Donohue wrote a more muted concurrence that Chief Justice Debra Todd joined. It criticized the lower court for “disturbing the status quo” because county boards of election could use it in surveying mail-in ballots.

All three judges are Democrats.

Despite not applying to ballots cast last Tuesday, the ruling became a flashpoint in the battle between Casey and McCormick as counties prepared to count provisional ballots. It could be due to a Pittsburgh Tribune story that seemed to tie the provisional ballot ruling with the Casey-McCormick race.

Casey campaign manager Tiernan Donohue accused McCormick of looking to block “large tranches of votes” while Casey wants them to be counted. She said the “democratic process must be allowed to play out to determine the result of this election.”

Republican election attorney Linda Kerns said Democrats are misinterpreting the Commonwealth Court ruling because it only applied to the September special election.

“The Trial court allowed the counting of undated mail ballots just from that election. The Commonwealth Court affirmed,” she told DVJournal.

McCormick leads Casey by less than half a percentage point. He’s declared victory but a recount is pending. The Associated Press also called the race for McCormick.

McCormick is currently in Washington for Senate orientation. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer was hesitant to invite McCormick to that orientation, but eventually relented after Republicans complained.

Casey has yet to concede. His campaign and national Democrats promise there’s still a chance he’ll win.

Notorious Democrat lawyer Marc E. Elias, one of the people behind the discredited “Steele Dossier,” is in the Keystone State canvassing ballots.

A Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee communications strategist suggested McCormick doesn’t believe he’ll win and cited the state Supreme Court case and a separate suit in Philadelphia over GOP representation during provisional ballot reviews. That suit was withdrawn.

A Casey strategist later posted on social media, “Campaigns don’t try to disenfranchise voters when they think a race is over.”

Fellow Democratic Sens. Michael Bennet of Colorado and Mark Kelly of Arizona also lent support to Casey. The two demanded all votes be counted before a winner is declared.

While ballots in Philadelphia have been counted, there are still pending ballots in the Delaware Valley. Montgomery County has 6,500 ballots to examine while Chester County has several dozen. Delaware Count has 4,560 provisional ballots. Bucks County did not respond to DVJournal’s request for provisional ballot totals.

The McCormick campaign and other Republicans remain confident.

“It’s over, as always. (I feel like a broken record),” wrote McCormick political strategist Mark Harris on X.

Kerns said there aren’t enough remaining ballots to change the outcome of the race.

“Casey has no path to victory.”

Documents released by court order show Tredyffrin/Easttown teachers are learning about Critical Race Theory and how to “transform” the district. However, a lawyer for the school district says the controversial race-based theory is not reaching students.

Parent Ben Auslander contended Tredyffrin/Easttown School District officials violated his First Amendment rights when he tried to take verbal notes on Critical Race Theory (CRT) materials from a vendor.

Auslander, working with America First Legal and Wayne attorney Walter Zimolong, sued the district, winning the release of 166 pages of documents that vendor Pacific Educational Group (PEG), a California-based education consultant supplied to T/E.

PEG claims “systemic racism is the most devastating factor contributing to the diminished capacity of all children.” The district had hired the company to run teacher training and shape the curriculum, according to the America First Legal (AFL) press statement.

Auslander wanted to see the PEG materials. District officials told him he could look at the papers, but he could not take notes or pictures and had to look at the materials at the district office.

When Auslander tried to make a voice recording on his cell phone about what he saw, he was told to leave and officials threatened to call the police, the lawsuit said.

The materials show, “PEG’s ‘training’ of the district staff included exercises on’ walking through the barriers to teaching Critical Race Theory at your school,’ and how ‘Critical Race Theory is a vital step in your School Transformation Action Plan,'” according to AFL.

Kenneth Roos, the district solicitor, denied CRT is taught in the school district but acknowledged it is part of “district staff discussions.”

“To be clear, CRT is not taught in TESD schools,” said Roos. “The district has developed its own initiative related to equity, inclusion, and belonging. The district works with multiple vendors to craft the steps to support our own initiative. In some EIB initiative leadership training (including the ones PEG did), district staff discussed with each other (not students) what CRT is and how it fits into the national context. CRT is not an underpinning of what the district teaching in the classroom, and it is not in the TESD curriculum.”

However, former school board Director Kyle Boyer acknowledged at a public meeting in 2021 the district does use elements of CRT in its curriculum.

Zimolong said the newly-released documents counter claims made by Roos. “His claims could only be true if you ignore what the CRT documents bought and paid for by the school district say. Indeed, page eight of the documents sets forth a ‘School Transformation Plan’ using the teaching of CRT to achieve that transformation. The school district’s comments recall Orwell in ‘1984’ who wrote, ‘[t]he party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.'”

The judge’s decision is “a great outcome if you’re in favor of transparency and knowing what is being taught to your kids in school and you don’t like when any government agency tries to sandbag and cover up from a citizen what their tax dollars are being spent on,” said Zimolong.

The litigation is continuing. While obtaining the documents was part of the process, claims regarding how his client was treated by school officials remain to be litigated. Zimolong said officials had violated Auslander’s First Amendment rights by not permitting him to record his thoughts.

Auslander could not be reached for comment.

The next phase of the court case will require depositions from school officials, Zimolong said. After that, there may be a hearing in September or Judge Harvey Bartle III might rule based on the results of the depositions.

For his part, Roos said the district continues to believe the case should be dismissed.

Andrew McClellan, a parent whose son is a student at Conestoga High School, is very unhappy with both the racial and transgender curriculum that he says is being taught in district schools.

“To be honest with you, we’ve known this has been going on for a long time,” said McClellan. “All their transgender promotion and the grooming that they’re doing. They’re sexualizing these kids. It’s all done in secrecy, then they lie to the parents about it…The majority of their policies and curriculum, if you can even call it curriculum, the ideologies, the grooming, it’s all there and they lie to us about it. It’s horrific. How did we get here?”

“It’s been an agenda,” he said. “It’s been a takeover.”

Meanwhile, the AFL lawyers believe these PEG materials illustrate that CRT is being taught in many districts across the country.

“This should forever end all debate. Our innocent children are being viciously indoctrinated with CRT by Marxist radicals. This lawless, extremist, poisonous bigotry must be defeated,” said Stephen Miller AFL president.

AFL Vice-President and General Counsel, Gene Hamilton, said, “These documents establish–once and for all–that CRT is present in public schools across the country. And not only is it present, but it is being funded by taxpayers across this country with hundreds of thousands of dollars being spent in each individual school district.

“The American people do not want their money being spent on these toxic training materials under any circumstance, but especially not while their children attend classes that are overcrowded, their teachers are underpaid, and in school buildings that are in need of repair. Every dollar spent on this nonsense is a dollar wasted,” Hamilton said.

Please follow DVJournal on social media: Twitter@DVJournal or Facebook.com/DelawareValleyJournal