inside sources print logo
Get up to date Delaware Valley news in your inbox

DRAPEAU: Why Are Lawmakers Attacking Digital Ads?

t’s a no-brainer: any small business that wants to succeed in today’s hyper-connected world must have an online presence. I’ve researched small businesses for years. The data repeatedly confirm that e-commerce and digital advertising are incredibly effective ways for America’s small businesses to reach customers and increase their revenue. So, I don’t understand why so many state and federal policymakers don’t understand this and seem hellbent on breaking the digital advertising ecosystem that works so well for so many people.

Let’s start with the facts. New research recently published by the Data Catalyst Institute finds that small businesses’ digital ads reach more potential customers and drive more revenue than traditional advertising on TV, radio and billboards. Nearly 80 percent of small businesses attribute digital ads to helping them compete against larger companies. It’s completely understandable why more than two-thirds of small businesses’ advertising budgets are spent on digital formats such as social media, search, display and mobile-only ads.

Selling digital ads is also a crucial revenue driver for small publishers — websites, blogs, email newsletters, podcasters and video channels. Free content publishers — the overwhelming majority of online publications — survive and thrive because advertising sustains them. By targeting niche, hard-to-reach audiences, small publishers can charge premium advertising prices to other businesses that need to reach those same audiences. Data-driven, relevant advertising works so well that a small publisher can generate revenue on the first day of publication with some planning.

A remarkable 71 percent of small publishers surveyed said they would not have been able to start their business without advertising revenue.

Many legislators and regulators think that Google and Meta are the only digital advertising options and that their size justifies more regulation. But our research shows that most small-business advertisers disagree. They reported using 11 digital advertising platforms, and most respondents bought ads simultaneously through several platforms. Google and Meta are the most prominent advertising platforms, but Amazon, Microsoft and Twitter are strong competitors for reaching different audiences. Less known is that Walmart, Target and other “traditional” retailers have followed Amazon into advertising, transforming their huge online stores and marketplaces into platforms to host digital ads from small business retailers.

Simply put, digital ads work because they are inexpensive, easy to buy, and reach relevant audiences. This is particularly helpful for typical small-business owners who need to be smart about spending their time and working capital.

Anonymous consumer data collected by advertising platforms enable small businesses to place relevant ads on websites, blogs and other publications popular with the advertiser’s customers and potential customers. But right now, the Federal Trade Commission is exploring new rules that would make it harder for platforms to collect and analyze consumer data, while a proposed Florida bill would do something similar. If these regulatory efforts succeed, small-business advertisements could revert to the days of Yellow Pages and coupon mailers when there was no assurance that people who saw the ads would be interested in the product or service being promoted.

After experiencing digital advertising success, small businesses don’t want to return to the Advertising Stone Age, and for a good reason. Since they don’t have the sizable marketing budgets to advertise on mass media like their larger competitors, overregulation of digital advertising could devastate the small business economy. In fact, in research that the Data Catalyst Institute published in 2022, Dartmouth College professor John T. Scott estimated that legislation targeting “Big Tech” digital platforms could cost small businesses $500 billion in sales over five years.

Lawmakers love to talk about their support for small businesses. If they’re serious, they’ll abandon misguided efforts to tear down the digital advertising system crucial to small businesses’ success. Small businesses need affordable, easy-to-use, and effective digital tools to grow and thrive, and that’s precisely what today’s digital advertising platforms provide.

New GOP Ad Targets Wild as Soft on Crime

When 173 congressional Democrats voted to uphold Washington D.C.’s new crime policy, lowering the penalties for carjacking and other violent crimes, Pennsylvania’s Rep Susan Wild was proud to count herself among them.

On Wednesday, as U.S. Senate Democrats like Bob Casey prepare to support a GOP proposal to override the D.C. government and kill the proposal, Republicans are targeting Wild for her “soft on crime” vote in a new digital ad.

It’s a reminder of how quickly politics can turn in Washington, D.C.

“Forget safe streets and neighborhoods — House Democrats remain more concerned with promoting policies that appease violent criminals,” said National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman Richard Hudson“This is just a preview of how these extremist House Democrats will be held accountable for coddling criminals all cycle long.”

Wild is one of 15 Democrats being targeted by the NRCC.

From the ad:


Carjackers given slaps on the wrist by pandering politicians.

Not just the D.C. City Council. 

173 House Democrats voted for reduced sentences for violent crimes.

So crazy even President Biden won’t support the anarchy.

What’s next? Defund the police?

Tell Susan Wild to keep Pennsylvania families safe.”

Congressional Democrats complain that they’ve been left hanging by the White House after President Biden appeared to reverse his stance on the GOP resolution overriding the crime bill. As of Tuesday, support for the D.C. government had fallen so low, even Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said he was going to vote for the GOP measure.

“I’m going to vote ‘yes,’ Schumer told reporters. “It was a close question, but on balance I’m voting ‘yes.’”

Axios reports that House Democrats are “rip roarin’ pissed” over the White House reversal. “He [Biden] is going to have a much harder time asking people to take tough votes after this,” a House Democrat said.

Wild is viewed as a solidly liberal member of the Democratic caucus, with a 93.84 percent rating from Progressive Punch, which ranks members on their voting record. Her support for D.C.’s progressive crime policy isn’t her first political controversy. During the 2o22 campaign, she suggested that Carbon County, Pa. voters needed to be “schooled” because they chose to vote for Donald Trump.

“I’m not quite sure what was in their heads because the people of Carbon County are exactly the kind of people who should not be voting for a Donald Trump, but I guess I might have to school them on that a little bit,”  Wild said.

Please follow DVJournal on social media: Twitter@DVJournal or