In an incredibly divisive election season, there is one thing that major pundits and political figures I bring on my show agree on: Whichever presidential candidate wins Pennsylvania is going to win the presidency.
Pennsylvania is a swing state and has 19 electoral votes, making it the key state to reach the required 270 electoral votes and win the presidency.
So, why did Vice President Kamala Harris choose Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz over Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro as her running mate? Is Shapiro not seen as a popular and capable governor? On the contrary, he is seen as very capable and has a job approval rating of about 61 percent.
Shapiro’s also a world-class campaigner and even though very liberal, he has been able to posture effectively as a moderate and even somewhat bipartisan. Walz is from a deep blue state, and someone known as at least as progressive as Harris.
You will hear spin that Shapiro was not chosen because he is not viewed as a team player. Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman (D) apparently was instrumental in pointing that out to Harris and her advisors. And Shapiro was labeled as “overly ambitious.” Shapiro seemed like he’s been running for president for years. With Harris viewed as a weak political player, she and her advisers probably thought Shapiro, would overshadow her.
However, I think the main reason he wasn’t chosen is a lot uglier than that. Shapiro is Jewish and has properly and publicly defended the right of Israel to defend itself against enemies who launched horrific attacks on innocent people in Israel: the unspeakable savagery of the Hamas attacks on Oct. 7. He supported Israel’s attempts to hunt down members of Hamas. He also pushed back against the mobs on college campuses like Columbia University, the University of Pennsylvania, and others that allowed Jewish students on their campuses to be threatened and attacked.
Those moral and logical positions are not allowed by significant numbers of the current Democratic Party. On CNN, progressive Van Jones agreed Shapiro was passed over because, “You also have antisemitism that has gotten marbled into this party. You can be for the Palestinians without being an anti- Jewish bigot, but there are some anti-Jewish bigots out there. And there’s some disquiet now- and there has to be- how much of what just happened is caving into some of the darker parts of the party?”
That a polite way of saying the progressive mob of the party has veto power over almost any supporter of Israel.
So, what has Harris gotten in Walz? First, he’s a governor who took days to send in the national guard as cities in Minnesota were burning during riots after the killing of George Floyd. Walz has backed defunding the police and opposes fracking.
Yet, he has been sold as a guy who can come to places like rural Pennsylvania and reach voters through a progressive agenda and a folksy persona. He has said things like, “One person’s socialism is another person’s neighborliness.” Apparently, because he likes cabins and ice fishing, he will be able to win back Trump voters across the more remote parts of Pennsylvania. Watch for Republicans to highlight his cozy relationship with the Communist Chinese Party leadership and his abandoning of his leadership role in the Minnesota National Guard when it was going to be deployed in Iraq.
I see Walz as someone who mirrors Harris’ radical agenda and someone who will get no traction in Pennsylvania, other than in Democratic bastions like Philadelphia. As far as Josh Shapiro, he is a very formidable opponent who has been taught a brutal lesson about the bigotry of his own party.
Please follow DVJournal on social media: X@DVJournal or Facebook.com/DelawareValleyJournal
