Appeals Court Overrides Ruling, Puts Sautner Back on the Ballot

She’s back on the ballot.
On Thursday, three Commonwealth Court judges—Anne E. Covey, Gloria Dumas, and Matthew S. Wolfe- reversed a Montgomery County judge, allowing Lower Merion School Board President Kerry Sautner’s name to appear on the May 20 Democratic primary ballot.
Lower Merion resident Harshal Dear, a registered Democratic voter, had filed a challenge against Sautner to keep her off the ballot because Sautner, who is seeking reelection, filed an incorrect financial information form with the Board of Elections.
Previously, Judge Carolyn Carluccio determined Sautner had not properly filed out her required financial disclosure form, even after Carluccio allowed her to try again and resubmit it. Sautner filed four forms with the court, the fourth statement in a motion to reconsider. It included the section she had previously left blank, asserting that she had no ownership in a property leased by her employer, Eastern State Penitentiary Historic Site, where she is the president and CEO, according to the Commonwealth Court ruling.
The lower court judge denied her motion to reconsider, noting that her repeated failure to fill out the form correctly “suggests a purposeful avoidance of providing a definitive answer to that question.”
In her appeal, Sautner claimed she did not act “in bad faith” and Carluccio should have accepted her fourth financial form, which was filed after the judge had already ruled in favor of Dear.
In their decision, the Commonwealth Court judges wrote, “Candidate may not have read the instructions and repeatedly misunderstood the need to complete block 8. Indeed, in those cases, we permitted candidates to file amended statements despite omitting tax liens, judgments, and income, much like Candidate’s incomplete Block 8. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court and direct the (Election) Board to accept Candidate’s Final Amended Statement.”
“In light of the longstanding policy to protect a candidate’s right to run for office and the electorate’s right to vote for the candidate of its choice, Candidate must be restored to the ballot,” the Commonwealth Court ruled.
Timothy Ford, Sautner’s lawyer, said, “I’m happy to see the Commonwealth Court recognize what we knew all along: Kerry made all of her required disclosures, even over-disclosing, and there was never any evidence whatsoever that Kerry filled out her forms in bad faith. Kerry is the kind of leader we need in our community, and I’m glad that the Commonwealth Court gave voters in the Lower Merion School District the chance to see Kerry’s name on the ballot for reelection in next month’s primary.”
Dear’s lawyer, Christian Petrucci, said, “The Commonwealth Court’s opinion is perplexing. The panel, consisting of two Democrats and one Republican, did not address whether Judge Carluccio had abused her discretion in granting Ms. Dear’s objection, which, respectfully, should have been the entire inquiry.
“All of the cases the Court relied upon dealt with the opportunity to amend a Statement of Financial Interests a single time, not multiple times, and certainly not following a court-ordered (finding) of a deficient filing. The Court even noted the Election Board’s objection that the candidate should not be permitted to make unlimited amendments, but did not give any weight to, or even address that objection.
“Finally, the Court rejected Judge Carluccio’s finding that the filing of multiple invalid SOFIs constitutes bad faith. They, instead, imputed good faith to the candidate with admittedly no evidence to do so. They said that since the candidate did not testify, we don’t know what her intent was. Considering the judge did not give us an opportunity to cross-examine the candidate, we never will. A remand to the trial judge for the testimony of the candidate was at least warranted.”
Petrucci added, “Ms. Dear is considering her options.”