A nationwide grassroots movement appeared to spring up seemingly out of nowhere in early 2021. A grassroots movement that hasn’t been seen since the days of the tea party in 2010.

This grassroots movement is unique in its intentions and motivations. The movement isn’t being driven by outrage about tax policies, healthcare, or federal government spending. Instead, it has emerged because of the mismanagement and indoctrination that is affecting America’s most precious future resource: Our youth.

The movement is also unique in who’s leading the charge. The leaders of this movement are not politicians, corporate interests, or media personalities. It’s led by parents taking time out of their busy schedules to advocate for their families and the future of our nation. Particularly, mothers (many of whom traditionally stayed away from politics) are emerging as a significant force in holding their local school districts accountable. It has been inspiring, to say the least.

The seeds were planted in the fall of 2020. Parents around our nation were frustrated at education officials dragging their feet to reopen schools for in-person learning. Parents observed the negative effects on their children resulting from remote learning. Working-class parents had difficulties ensuring supervision as they returned to in-person jobs. By then, the science was clear that the risk of serious COVID-19 complications in children was (and remains) minuscule.

Powerful teacher unions around the nation lobbied state and federal officials to delay a return to in-person instruction. Parents had enough and began to speak out through op-eds and social media.

Also in 2020 was the increasing prevalence of Critical Race Theory (CRT). It claims white supremacy is pervasive in in all facets of American society and that White students play a part in upholding that supremacy. It is a theory that trains young minds to hate their country and teaches racist views about fellow classmates. Under the guise of equity, teachers and administrators began to incorporate CRT into their curriculum and required readings.

Parents shared shocking testimonials on social media of what their children were being subjected to. These parents began to organize at local school board meetings to ask questions and voice their displeasure.

Next, came the debate over children being required to wear masks in school. Many parents questioned the science and data providing evidence of masks limiting transmission in a school setting. Breathing problems, increased occurrence of headaches, and fatigue were some of the effects parents observed in children from all-day mask-wearing during the last school year. Some parents noticed a drop in academic performance.

These parents once again utilized social media to voice their opposition and attended school board meetings to advocate for optional mask-wearing. It had an effect as 90 percent of schools in Pennsylvania opted to make mask-wearing optional. This was later met with a statewide mandate from the governor after local officials and parents made a decision that his administration did not like.

The parental rights movement has grown nationwide. Grassroots groups such as “Moms for Liberty” are emerging in almost every county in Pennsylvania. This fall, more concerned parents than ever are running for office to have a voice on their local school board. Many of whom have never been involved in politics until this moment.

While the emergence of the parental rights movement is encouraging for those who champion citizen advocacy and welcome parents taking an active interest in improving our schools, the powers that be view this movement as a threat to the status quo. Unified parents projecting a strong voice have captured the attention of those in the highest levels of government.

The National School Boards Association sent a letter to the White House requesting the full force of federal law enforcement to stop “threats and acts of violence” from parents and utilize domestic terrorism laws to intimidate parents.

It’s worth noting that the Pennsylvania School Boards Association has disavowed the letter stating it was “never consulted prior to the letter being sent by the National School Boards Association.”

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland responded to the letter with a memo in which he announced the Justice Department would expand its activity to establish a task force comprised of representatives from multiple departments and bureaus to determine how federal enforcement tools can be used to prosecute parents who are out of order.

While isolated acts of violence and direct threats should be investigated appropriately, Garland has gone too far with these attempts at intimidation.

Concerned parents are not domestic terrorists and do not deserve the wrath of federal law enforcement. These citizens are exercising the same rights that Americans have always exercised to create change and give voice to the voiceless.

Parents gather information and do their utmost to make informed decisions that are in the best interest of their children. They know the children’s strengths and weaknesses best and love their kids more than any bureaucrat or elected official does. We should welcome their increased interest in school board affairs, not investigate or intimidate them.